Rahul, a transporter was entrusted with the duty of transporting tomatoes from a rural farm to a city by Aswin. Due to heavy rains, Rahul was…
CA Foundation · Business Laws · MTP · September 2024
Rahul, a transporter was entrusted with the duty of transporting tomatoes from a rural farm to a city by Aswin. Due to heavy rains, Rahul was stranded for more than two days. Rahul sold the tomatoes below the market rate in the nearby market where he was stranded fearing that the tomatoes may perish. Can Aswin recover the loss from Rahul on the ground that Rahul had acted beyond his authority?
Suggested Answer and Working Notes:
(i) Doctrine of Indoor Management: The Doctrine of Indoor Management is the exception to the Doctrine of Constructive Notice. The Doctrine of Constructive Notice does not mean that outsiders are deemed to have notice of the internal affairs of the company. For instance, if an act is authorised by the Articles or Memorandum, an outsider is entitled to assume that all the detailed formalities for doing that act have been observed. The doctrine of Indoor Management is important to persons dealing with a company through its directors or other persons. They are entitled to assume that the acts of the directors or other officers of the company are validly performed, if they are within the scope of their apparent authority. So long as an act is valid under the Articles, if done in a particular manner, an outsider dealing with the company is entitled to assume that it has been done in the manner required. In the given question, Mr. Mohan has made payment to Mr. Ramesh and he (Mr. Ramesh) gave to receipt of the same to Mr. Mohan. Thus, it will be rightful on part of Mr. Mohan to assume that Mr. Ramesh was also authorised to receive money on behalf of the company. Hence, Mr. Mohan will be free from liability for payment of goods purchased from Sunflower Limited, as he has paid amount due to an employee of the company. (ii) Foreign Company [Section 2 (42) of the Companies Act, 2013]: It means any company or body corporate incorporated outside India which — (i) has a place of business in India whether by itself or through an agent, physically or through electronic mode; and (ii) conducts any business activity in India in any other manner. Since Mike Limited is a company incorporated in India, hence, it cannot be called as a foreign company. Even though, Liaison Office was officially established at Singapore, it would not be called as a foreign company as per the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.
Topics: The Indian Contract Act, 1872
Related Questions in this Topic
- Some objects and consideration are unlawful. Define any six with reference to provisions of the Indian Contract Act, 187...
- In light of provisions of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 answer the following: (i) Mr. S and Mr. R made contract wherein...
- Mr. Sohan, a wealthy individual provided a loan of ₹ 80,000 to Mr. Mukesh on 26th February, 2025. The borrower, Mr. Muke...
- (i) Mr. L let out his residential house to Mr. M for ₹ 50,000 p.m. for a period of one year. According to the Rent agree...
- Preeti, a minor, falsely representing her age, enters into an agreement with an authorised Laptop dealer Mr. Mittal, own...