Mr. Vikas a businessman has been fighting a long-drawn litigation with Mr. Neeraj an industrialist. To support his legal campaign, he enlists the…

CA Foundation · Business Laws · MTP · June 2024
Mr. Vikas a businessman has been fighting a long-drawn litigation with Mr. Neeraj an industrialist. To support his legal campaign, he enlists the services of Mr. Manoj a Judicial officer stating that the amount of 10 lakhs would be paid to him if he does not take up the brief of Mr. Neeraj . Mr. Manoj agrees but, at the end of the litigation Mr. Vikas refuses to pay to Mr. Manoj . Decide whether Mr. Manoj can recover the amount promised by Mr. Vikas under the provisions of the Indian Contract Act, 1872?

Suggested Answer and Working Notes:

(i) It was decided by the court in the case of Gilford Motor Co. Vs. Horne, that if the company is formed simply as a mere device to evade legal obligations, though this is only in limited and discrete circumstances, courts can pierce the corporate veil. In other words, if the company is a mere sham or cloak, the separate legal entity can be disregarded. On considering the decision taken in Gilford Motor Co. Vs. Horne and facts of the problem given, it is very much clear that Nine Stars Timbers Private Limited was formed just to evade legal obligations of the agreement between Mr. Samyak and Moonlight Timber Private Limited. Hence, Nine Stars Timbers Private Limited is just a sham or cloak and the separate legal entity between Mr. Samyak and Nine Stars Timbers Private Limited should be disregarded. (ii) According to the provisions of Section 2 (45) of Companies Act, 2013, Government Company means any company in which not less than 51% of the paid-up share capital is held by - (i) the Central Government, or (ii) by any State Government or Governments, or (iii) partly by the Central Government and partly by one or more State Governments, and the section includes a company which is a subsidiary company of such a Government company. According to Section 2 (87) , “subsidiary company” in relation to any other company (that is to say the holding company), means a company in which the holding exercises or controls more than one-half of the total voting power either at its own or together with one or more of its subsidiary companies. By virtue of provisions of Section 2 (87) of Companies Act, 2013, Rama Auto Private Limited is a subsidiary company of Pacific Motors Limited because Pacific Motors Limited is holding more than one-half of the total voting power in Rama Auto Private Limited. Further as per Section 2 (45) , a subsidiary company of Government Company is also termed as Government Company. Hence, Rama Auto Private Limited, being a subsidiary of Pacific Motors Limited will also be considered as Government Company.

Topics: The Indian Contract Act, 1872, The Indian Contract Act, 1872, The Indian Contract Act, 1872

Open in Interactive Practice Hub · Full Practice Hub · Chapter Weightage · More in this subject

Related Questions in this Topic