(i) Nolimit Private Company is incorporated as unlimited company having share capital of 10,00,000. One of its creditors, Mr. Samuel filed a suit…
CA Foundation · Business Laws · MTP · June 2024
(i) Nolimit Private Company is incorporated as unlimited company having share capital of 10,00,000. One of its creditors, Mr. Samuel filed a suit against a shareholder Mr. Innocent for recovery of his debt against Nolimit Private Company. Mr. Innocent has given his plea in the court that he is not liable as he is just a shareholder. Explain whether Mr. Samuel will be successful in recovering his dues from Mr. Innocent? (ii) A Company registered under Section 8 of the Companies Act, 2013, has been consistently making profits for the past 5 years after a major change in the management structure. Few members contented that they are entitled to receive dividends. Can the company distribute dividend? If yes, what is the maximum percentage of dividend that can be distributed as per provisions of the Companies Act, 2013? Also, to discuss this along with other regular matters, the company held a general meeting by giving only 14 days’ notice. Is this valid?
Suggested Answer and Working Notes:
(i) Section 2 (92) of Companies Act, 2013, provides that an unlimited company means a company not having any limit on the liability of its members. The liability of each member extends to the whole amount of the company’s debts and liabilities, but he will be entitled to claim contribution from other members. In case the company has share capital, the Articles of Association must state the amount of share capital and the amount of each share. So long as the company is a going concern the liability on the shares is the only liability which can be enforced by the company. The creditors can institute proceedings for winding up of the company for their claims. The official liquidator may call the members for their contribution towards the liabilities and debts of the company, which can be unlimited. On the basis of above, it can be said that Mr. Samuel cannot directly claim his dues against the company from Mr. Innocent, the shareholder of the company even the company is an unlimited company. Mr. Innocent is liable upto his share capital. His unlimited liability will arise when official liquidator calls the members for their contribution towards the liabilities and debts of the company at the time of winding up of company. (ii) A company registered under Section 8 of the Companies Act, 2013 is prohibited from the payment of any dividends to its members. Hence in the given case, the contention of the members to distribute dividend from the profits earned is wrong. Also, Section 8 company is allowed to call a general meeting by giving 14 days instead of 21 days.
Topics: The Companies Act, 2013
Related Questions in this Topic
- (i) What do you mean by 'Common Seal'? Is it necessary for a company to have Common Seal? Discuss as per provisions of t...
- (i) Mr. Vijay sold his business of cotton production to a cotton production company, CPL Private Limited, in which he he...
- Mr. R, a manufacturer of toys approached MNO Private Limited for supply of raw material worth ₹ 1,50,000/-. Mr. R was of...
- (i) Tycoon Private Limited is the holding company of Glassware Private Limited. As per the last profit and loss account ...
- Do you agree that a company is an artificial person? Elucidate. Also explain how the authorization by M/s Beeta Limited,...