"Corporate veil sometimes fails to protect the members of the company from the liability connected to the company's actions." Explain any three…
CA Foundation · Business Laws · PYQS · September 2024
"Corporate veil sometimes fails to protect the members of the company from the liability connected to the company's actions." Explain any three instances.
Suggested Answer and Working Notes:
"Corporate veil sometimes fails to protect the members of the company from the liability connected to the company's actions." The following are the cases where company law disregards the principle of corporate personality or the principle that the company is a legal entity distinct and separate from its shareholders or members: (1) To determine the character of the company i.e. to find out whether co-enemy or friend: It is true that, unlike a natural person, a company does not have mind or conscience; therefore, it cannot be a friend or foe. It may, however, be characterised as an enemy company, if its affairs are under the control of people of an enemy country. For this purpose, the Court may examine the character of the persons who are really at the helm of affairs of the company. (2) To protect revenue/tax: In certain matters concerning the law of taxes, duties and stamps particularly where question of the controlling interest is in issue. (i) Where corporate entity is used to evade or circumvent tax, the Court can disregard the corporate entity. (ii) Where the company was not a genuine company at all but merely the assessee himself disguised under the legal entity of a limited company. (3) To avoid a legal obligation: Where it was found that the sole purpose for the formation of the company was to use it as a device to reduce the amount to be paid by way of bonus to workmen, the Supreme Court upheld the piercing of the veil to look at the real transaction (The Workmen Employed in Associated Rubber Industries Limited, Bhavnagar vs. The Associated Rubber Industries Ltd., Bhavnagar and another). (4) Formation of subsidiaries to act as agents: A company may sometimes be regarded as an agent or trustee of its members, or of another company, and may therefore be deemed to have lost its individuality in favour of its principal. Here the principal will be held liable for the acts of that company. (5) Company formed for fraud/improper conduct or to defeat law: Where the device of incorporation is adopted for some illegal or improper purpose, e.g., to defeat or circumvent law, to defraud creditors or to avoid legal obligations.
Topics: The Companies Act, 2013
Related Questions in this Topic
- (i) What do you mean by 'Common Seal'? Is it necessary for a company to have Common Seal? Discuss as per provisions of t...
- (i) Mr. Vijay sold his business of cotton production to a cotton production company, CPL Private Limited, in which he he...
- Mr. R, a manufacturer of toys approached MNO Private Limited for supply of raw material worth ₹ 1,50,000/-. Mr. R was of...
- (i) Tycoon Private Limited is the holding company of Glassware Private Limited. As per the last profit and loss account ...
- Do you agree that a company is an artificial person? Elucidate. Also explain how the authorization by M/s Beeta Limited,...