A, B and C are partners in an unregistered partnership firm named M/s ABC & Associates. Is the suit maintainable in the following cases as per…

CA Foundation · Business Laws · PYQS · September 2025
A, B and C are partners in an unregistered partnership firm named M/s ABC & Associates. Is the suit maintainable in the following cases as per the provisions of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932? Give justification also. (iii) M filed a suit against the firm M/s ABC & Associates for the recovery of 10,000/- dues from the firm. M also owed - 4,000/- to the firm. The firm claimed a set off of 4,000/-.

Suggested Answer and Working Notes:

(iii) M filed a suit against the firm for recovery of 10,000/- dues. M also owed - 4,000/-. The firm claimed a set-off: The said suit by M is Maintainable Justification: According to Section 69 (2) of the Indian Partnership Act,1932, in case of an unregistered firm, an action can be brought against the firm by a third party. If an action is brought against the firm by a third party, then neither the firm nor the partner can claim any set-off, if the suit be valued for more than 100or pursue other proceedings to enforce the rights arising from any contract. Here, M filed a suit against the firm for the recovery of 10,000 dues from the firm. M also owed - 4,000/- to the firm. The firm cannot set-off the claim of 4,000/- as it is more than - 100/-. Nevertheless, M is entitled for recovery of 10,000 from firm.

Topics: The Indian Partnership Act, 1932

Open in Interactive Practice Hub · Full Practice Hub · Chapter Weightage · More in this subject

Related Questions in this Topic