M/s Janta Machine Tools & Co. contracted with M/s Ruchi Traders to make and deliver certain machinery by 31st July for 15 Lakhs. There was a…
CA Foundation · Business Laws · RTP · May 2025
M/s Janta Machine Tools & Co. contracted with M/s Ruchi Traders to make and deliver certain machinery by 31st July for 15 Lakhs. There was a labour strike in the factory of M/s Janta Machine Tools & Co. and it could not manufacture and deliver the machinery to M/s Ruchi Traders. Afterwards, M/s Ruchi Traders had to purchase the machinery from another manufacturer for 18 Lakhs. M/s Ruchi Traders was also prevented from performing a contract which was made with M/s Shiksha Technologies at the time of its contract with M/s Janta Machine Tools & Co. and were compelled to pay compensation of 2 Lakhs to M/s Shiksha Technologies. M/s Janta Machine Tools & Co. was very well informed by M/s Ruchi Traders about its contract with M/s Shiksha Technologies. M/s Ruchi Traders sued M/s Janta Machine Tools & Co for recovery of compensation of 3 Lakhs (i.e.18 Lakhs – 15 Lakhs) plus 2 Lakhs given to M/s Shiksha Technologies. Advise under the provisions of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.
Suggested Answer and Working Notes:
Section 73 of the Indian Contract Act,1872, has laid down the rules as to how the amount of compensation is to be determined. On the breach of the contract, the party who suffers from such a breach is entitled to receive, from the party who has broken the contract, compensation for any loss or damage caused to him by breach. Compensation can be claimed for any loss or damage which naturally arises in the usual course of events. Further, compensation can also be claimed for any loss or damage which the party knew when they entered into the contract, as likely to result from the breach. That is to say, special damage can be claimed only on a previous notice. But the party suffering from the breach is bound to take reasonable steps to minimise the loss. No compensation is payable for any remote or indirect loss. In the instant case, M/s Ruchi Traders sued M/s Janta Machine Tools & Co. for recovery of compensation of 3Lakhs (i.e.18 Lakhs – 15Lakhs) plus 2Lakhs given to M/s Shiksha Technologies. As M/s Ruchi Traders informed M/s Janta Machine Tools & Co. about its contract with M/s Shiksha Technologies at the time of making the contract. Hence,2 Lakhs is a special damage which can be recovered with ordinary damages of 3Lakhs, which is the loss, caused to it.
Topics: The Indian Contract Act, 1872
Related Questions in this Topic
- Some objects and consideration are unlawful. Define any six with reference to provisions of the Indian Contract Act, 187...
- In light of provisions of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 answer the following: (i) Mr. S and Mr. R made contract wherein...
- Mr. Sohan, a wealthy individual provided a loan of ₹ 80,000 to Mr. Mukesh on 26th February, 2025. The borrower, Mr. Muke...
- (i) Mr. L let out his residential house to Mr. M for ₹ 50,000 p.m. for a period of one year. According to the Rent agree...
- Preeti, a minor, falsely representing her age, enters into an agreement with an authorised Laptop dealer Mr. Mittal, own...