Mr. Shankar sold 1000 Kgs wheat to Mr. Ganesh on credit of 3 months. Wheat was to be delivered after10 days of contract. After5 days of contract, a…
CA Foundation · Business Laws · MTP · April 2025
Mr. Shankar sold 1000 Kgs wheat to Mr. Ganesh on credit of 3 months. Wheat was to be delivered after10 days of contract. After5 days of contract, a friend of Mr. Shankar secretly informed him that Mr. Ganesh may default in payment. On the information of friend, Mr. Shankar applied the lien and withheld the delivery. With referring to the provisions of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930: (i) State, whether Mr. Shankar was right in his decision? (ii) What would be your answer if Mr. Ganesh became insolvent within five days of contract?
Suggested Answer and Working Notes:
(a) According to Section 45 (1) of the Sale of Goods Act,1930 the seller of goods is deemed to be an ‘Unpaid Seller’ when - (A) The whole of the price has not been paid or tendered. (B) A bill of exchange or other negotiable instrument was given as payment, but the same has been dishonoured, unless this payment was an absolute, and not a conditional payment. Further, Section 47 provides about an unpaid seller’s right of lien. Accordingly, an unpaid seller can retain the possession of the goods and refusal to deliver them to the buyer until the price due in respect of them is paid or tendered. This right can be exercised by him in the following cases only: (a) where goods have been sold without any stipulation of credit; (i.e., on cash sale) (b) where goods have been sold on credit but the term of credit has expired; or (c) where the buyer becomes insolvent. In the instant case, Mr. Ganesh purchased1000 Kgs wheat from Mr. Shankar on 3 month’s credit which was to be delivered after10 days of contract. But, after5 days of contract, one friend of Mr. Shankar secretly informed him that Mr. Ganesh may default in payment. On the belief of friend, Mr. Shankar applied the lien and withheld the delivery. (i) On the basis of above provisions and facts, it can be said that even Mr. Ganesh was an unpaid seller until the term of credit i.e. has expired. Hence, Mr. Shankar had to perform his promise of supplying1000 Kgs of wheat. (ii) In case Mr. Ganesh became insolvent before the delivery of wheat, Mr. Shankar had the right to apply the lien, and he could withhold the delivery.
Topics: The Sale of Goods Act, 1930
Related Questions in this Topic
- Neeraj entered in a contract with Rahul to purchase 1000 litres of mustard oil at the price which should be fixed by Aak...
- Mr. Mukesh was running a shop selling good quality washing machines. Mr. Vivaan came to his shop and asked for washing m...
- Ritvik sold 500 bags of wheat to Anoj. Each bag contains 50 Kilograms of wheat. Ritvik sent 450 bags by road transport a...
- J, a wholesaler of premium Basmati rice delivered on approval 100 bags of rice of 10 kg each to a local retailer, on sal...
- "Delivery of goods is an essential aspect of a contract of sale." Discuss the statement. Explain the various kinds of de...