Abhimanyu, a businessman, lost his important documents at a crowded railway station. Ramesh, a passerby, voluntarily collected the documents and…
CA Foundation · Business Laws · RTP · January 2026
Abhimanyu, a businessman, lost his important documents at a crowded railway station. Ramesh, a passerby, voluntarily collected the documents and returned them safely to Abhimanyu without expecting any reward. A week later, impressed by Ramesh’s honesty, Abhimanyu wrote and signed a promise to pay him - 50,000 as a reward. Later, Abhimanyu refused to pay, arguing that the act had already been performed voluntarily and therefore did not constitute valid consideration. Ramesh filed a case claiming that the promise was binding. Decide, under the Indian Contract Act, 1872, whether Abhimanyu is liable to pay.
Suggested Answer and Working Notes:
Specific goods in a deliverable state, when the seller has to do anything thereto in order to ascertain price (Section 22): Where there is a contract for the sale of specific goods in a deliverable state, but the seller is bound to weigh, measure, test or do some other act or thing with reference to the goods for the purpose of ascertaining the price, the property does not pass until such act or thing is done and the buyer has notice thereof.
Topics: The Indian Contract Act, 1872
Related Questions in this Topic
- Some objects and consideration are unlawful. Define any six with reference to provisions of the Indian Contract Act, 187...
- In light of provisions of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 answer the following: (i) Mr. S and Mr. R made contract wherein...
- Mr. Sohan, a wealthy individual provided a loan of ₹ 80,000 to Mr. Mukesh on 26th February, 2025. The borrower, Mr. Muke...
- (i) Mr. L let out his residential house to Mr. M for ₹ 50,000 p.m. for a period of one year. According to the Rent agree...
- Preeti, a minor, falsely representing her age, enters into an agreement with an authorised Laptop dealer Mr. Mittal, own...